Skip to content

One Rep Max (1RM) Calculator

Enter a weight and the reps you managed with it, and get an estimated one rep max plus the loads for 60-100% of it, without grinding out a true max.

Your results

Estimates for healthy adults, for education only. Not a medical assessment. Built and reviewed by Umair Hazrami.

How this calculator works

You give it two numbers: the weight on the bar and the reps you got (1-15). It runs three classic prediction equations and averages them.

  • Epley: weight × (1 + reps ÷ 30)
  • Brzycki: weight × 36 ÷ (37 − reps)
  • Lombardi: weight × reps^0.1

If you enter a single rep, the calculator simply returns that weight as your max. For anything else, the headline number is the plain average of the three. Example: 80 kg for 6 reps gives Epley 96 kg, Brzycki 92.9 kg and Lombardi 95.7 kg, so an estimated 1RM of about 94.9 kg.

The chart below the result multiplies that average by 60-100% and rounds each load to the nearest 2.5 kg, so it matches real plates (the plate calculator tells you exactly what to load). The “reps to failure” column runs Epley in reverse: 30 × (100 ÷ percentage − 1). That works out to about 5 reps at 85%, 8 at 80%, 10 at 75% and 20 at 60%.

Using your number in training

An estimated max is a planning tool. It is not a score to chase.

Most programs written in percentages (5/3/1, many powerlifting blocks, the free workout plans) need a 1RM to start. Plug in a recent hard set, pick your loads from the chart, and adjust after the first week. If 75% for 8 feels like a grinder, your estimate is probably high. Knock 2.5-5 kg off.

Pick a set that went close to failure with clean form. A set of 12 with three reps left in the tank will underestimate you, and a set where your hips shot up on the last rep will overestimate what you can do with good technique. For a set that deliberately stopped short, add your reps in reserve to the reps you did before entering it. Once you have the number, the RIR and RPE calculator turns it into working weights for any rep target.

Want to compare strength across body weights? Feed your estimated squat, bench and deadlift into the DOTS calculator. The trade-off between testing and estimating is covered in our guide to 1RM testing versus estimation equations.

Limitations and who it is not for

High reps make the formulas drift. In a study of 70 adults aged 18-69, 5RM tests predicted bench press and leg press 1RM better than 10RM or 20RM tests, and the authors advised using no more than 10 reps in linear equations (Reynolds et al., 2006). Work in 103 young women found the same pattern: predictions were more accurate from sets of fewer than 10 reps (Mayhew et al., 2008). The calculator flags any entry above 10 reps for this reason.

The exercise matters too. A small study of 16 men found more reps were possible at 60% of 1RM on the squat than on the bench press or arm curl (Shimano et al., 2006). One rep-to-percentage curve cannot fit every lift, so expect the chart to be less precise for high-rep work and for small isolation moves.

Beginners in their first few months will see their max move week to week, so recalculate often. Under-18s, anyone returning from injury, and anyone with heart disease or uncontrolled blood pressure should check with a doctor or physiotherapist before doing near-maximal sets at all.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate is a 1RM calculator?

For sets of roughly 10 reps or fewer, prediction equations usually land close to a tested max, and accuracy drops as the rep count climbs. Studies in mixed adults and in young women both found predictions were more accurate from sets under 10 reps. Treat it as an estimate with some error either way, and expect bigger misses on heavy lower-body lifts and on lifts where your technique is still changing.

Which rep range gives the best 1RM estimate?

Lower is generally better. In one study of 70 adults, 5RM data predicted bench press and leg press 1RM better than 10RM or 20RM data. A hard set of roughly 3-6 reps is a practical choice: heavy enough to give a tight estimate, light enough that it is not a max attempt.

Why does the calculator average three formulas?

Epley, Brzycki and Lombardi give slightly different answers for the same set, and no single one is best for every lifter or lift. Averaging them smooths out the quirks of each equation. The individual results are shown too, so you can see how far apart they are.

Should the set I enter be taken to failure?

Yes, or within about one rep of it. The formulas assume your reps were the most you could do with that weight, so a set where you stopped with three reps left will underestimate your max. If you left reps in the tank, add them to the reps you did and enter that total instead. 8 reps with 2 left becomes 10.

Can I use this for deadlifts, curls and machines?

You can, but treat the result more loosely. Research comparing free weight lifts found people did more reps at 60% of 1RM on the squat than on the bench press or arm curl, so one generic formula cannot fit every exercise. The gap between exercises was much smaller at 80% and 90% of 1RM, so estimates from heavy, low-rep sets are the least affected.

How often should I recalculate my 1RM?

Every 4-8 weeks, or whenever your working sets start feeling clearly lighter or heavier than the chart suggests. Plug in a recent hard set from your training log rather than testing a fresh max. If you are coming back from a layoff, recalculate before following any percentage-based plan.

Sources & References

Every claim above is checked against peer-reviewed research (PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine) or guidance from established health bodies. How we fact-check.

  1. Reynolds JM, et al. Prediction of one repetition maximum strength from multiple repetition maximum testing and anthropometry. J Strength Cond Res. 2006. PMID: 16937972
  2. Mayhew JL, et al. Accuracy of prediction equations for determining one repetition maximum bench press in women before and after resistance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2008. PMID: 18714230
  3. Shimano T, et al. Relationship between the number of repetitions and selected percentages of one repetition maximum in free weight exercises in trained and untrained men. J Strength Cond Res. 2006. PMID: 17194239